patching...
Update: Have you liked us on Facebook? Do it! It's the easiest way to stay connected to our content. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Lakeside Cityhood Movement Announces Arrival

The Lakeside City Alliance will study the feasibility of a city focused on the high school's attendance zone.

 

Will the Lakeside High School area find itself part of a new city?

The Lakeside City Alliance wants to find out. 

The non-profit, chaired by Northlake-area resident Mary Kay Woodworth, will hold its first public meeting at Lakeside High on Feb. 13 from 7 p.m. - 8 p.m. It released the following statement Wednesday:

Citizens Group Announces Cityhood Study Initiative for Northern DeKalb County

ATLANTA, GA — February 6, 2013— A group of DeKalb County citizens announced today the formation of the Lakeside City Alliance, a non-profit group created to study the possibility and feasibility of establishing a new city in northern DeKalb County.  The Alliance is chaired by Mary Kay Woodworth, a lifelong DeKalb County resident, who lives near the Northlake Mall area.  The Alliance released a draft map of the proposed parameters of the new city, which would be bounded roughly by Interstate 85 to the west, Clairmont Road to the south, Chamblee-Tucker Road to the east and Pleasantdale Road to the north.

In announcing the creation of the Alliance study group, Woodworth noted that the proposed boundaries represent the Alliance’s efforts to define the community of interest that encompasses the proposed city.  “After years of being 50,000 citizens without a voice, we are excited about the prospect of examining a form a government that is both closer and more responsive to the people it represents,” Woodworth said.  “The Alliance will study the type of government best-suited to our area with an emphasis on allowing for more local control of police services, parks and zoning.”

Woodworth noted that “members of the Alliance are all citizens of DeKalb County, and we look forward to assessing the feasibility of a local government that integrates efficiently with the current county government.  We will study ways to fund and sustain a new city that provides services best overseen locally, while ensuring that the County can continue to provide the services it delivers best for all residents of DeKalb.”

Woodworth explained that the group will host a series of public meetings to introduce the proposed map, discuss its plans with area residents and receive feedback from interested stakeholders.  The first meeting will be held at at Lakeside High School on Wednesday, February 13.

“Today begins a careful study of the best means to provide local control to taxpayers,” Woodworth declared, “who have felt for far too long that they were powerless to control their own destinies.  It is our hope that with the formation of the Lakeside City Alliance, help is finally on the way.”

Additional information can found regarding LCA by visiting LCA’s Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/LakesideCityAllianceGa), website (www.lakesidealliance.org) and Yahoo! Group (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lakesidealliance/)

The alliance has released a map of its proposed boundaries. To become a city, the state legislature would need to approve the idea and then voters would have to vote in favor of it. 

The alliance was featured in a WSB-TV news report as well.

What do you think about the proposed city of Lakeside? Tell us in the comments section below.

Related Topics: Lakeside City Alliance

Tom Doolittle

8:42 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

I'm glad this appears to have the top priority as "careful". My points exactly as I hope people have "carefully" read my opinion piece--not that anyone should place any import on it.

http://northdruidhills.patch.com/blog_posts/cityhood-on-tap-for-the-briarpatch-take-your-time-please

I hope that takes into consideration that moving to an economic study by the legislature just to get something in the pipeline is not "careful". First, we need to economic opinions, not one from a Georgia politically connected group that has never issued a negative opinion. It is tantamount to the state only using one school accrediting agency (SACS).

But even bigger than that--we don't even know each other as a community--as has been made obvious with the "Levitas Commission" (and the 501-c3's meeting) and well before that with a host of community organizing efforts.

Reply

aecotten

11:00 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

The map of this new city doesn't make sense. How is Embry Hills get included, while Sagamore Hills is mostly left out? What is the decision making process in the coverage of the City and why does it seem off center? (Just curious. Not trying to stir a pot.)

Reply
Comment_arrow

PJ

3:18 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Sagamore and Druid Hills probably don't offer much in the way additional revenue in the form of business licenses, HOST proceeds and franchise fees

Comment_arrow

RD

3:33 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

I think it's based upon the LHS district... although parts of this are claiming Tucker HS territory too.

Tracy White

11:27 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Rather rude to leave Leafmore/Creek Park out of the Lakeside proposal since we do attend the school. Never mind that we have a commercial district.

Reply

Lucas Roberts

11:54 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

No love for Sagamore.

It should at least go to Clairmont

Reply

Harry

11:54 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

I agree that the map is completely nonsensical. Almost half of it is outside 285 and it totally ignores both Sagamore and Druid Hills.

What is the logic of providing shared services as far away as Pleasnatdale Road but not as close as Clarimont Rd.?

Reply
Comment_arrow

PJ

3:15 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Sagamore and Druid Hills probably don't offer much in the way additional revenue in the form of business licenses, HOST proceeds and franchise fees.

Cheryl Miller

12:55 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Wow, that's confusing. So people who now live in Tucker, with a designated Tucker zip code, and have children attending elementary schools that are designated as part of the "Tucker cluster" would now live in the city of Lakeside? That's ... um.... uh... well, confusing.

Reply

Michael

1:47 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

There really should be two cities, and they shouldn't be based on school attendance zones. A city of Briarcliff should be incorporated on the western portion, spanning the area in between the Atlanta city limits and somewhere near Northlake Mall. The area spanning eastward from Northlake Mall, outside the perimeter, and to the DeKalb-Gwinnett border should be incorporated as the city of Tucker.

Reply
Comment_arrow

PJ

3:16 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Tucker is not a city - therefore no abiltiy to incorprated any areas.

Comment_arrow

JLo

7:32 pm on Monday, March 25, 2013

Since when is Tucker not a city?? I have it as the city on my address. Maybe I missed that memo.

intown.neighbor

2:12 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

I have to agree with the above posters that these proposed boundaries seem oddly drawn. Why exclude Leafmore and Sagamore Hills from a City of Lakeside, while including substantial portions of Tucker? An area spanning roughly the attendance zones for Druid Hills and Lakeside would seem far more coherent, and would fill the geographic gaps between the City of Atlanta, City of Decatur, and Avondale Estates.

Reply

Henry Batten

2:26 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

All of this information is very disturbing and represents some pretty suspicious, arbitrary thinking on someone's part (can we say Levitas?). According to the Secretary of State's office, this group is registered as a Domestic Nonprofit, with Levitas being the Registrar. That is not the same as being a 501(c)(3) with the IRS.

The best advice I have seen on this topic comes from Tom Doolittle in his article and this posting. However, no one seems to be listening to him. This is all moving way too rapidly and is going to end up dividing neighborhoods instead of bringing them together. If you thought the Brookhaven fight was nasty, wait for this to go any further.

Personally, we don't need yet another layer of government. We should be consolidating, not tearing everything into little fiefdoms. Oh, wait! This is Georgia, home to 159 county fiefdoms. So much for any chance for regional cooperation.

Reply

Local Boy

2:27 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

I posted this on the date listed in response to another Patch blog.....
Local Boy
2:39 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012

I would say start with the current cities - Decatur, Avondale, Lithonia, Stone Mountain, Clarkston, Chamblee, etc. - and see if they can extend their city limits. Then look at the zip codes - Tucker 30084, Druid Hills 30329 - these are already established communities, almost like cities. If more of central DeKalb wants to develop a plan, go for it. Hard part is finding the balance between residential and commercial tax districts.

Reply

Herman Lorenz

2:43 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Clearly we need a new city -- at least one new one. We need responsive government and local control. There are a lot of variations in shape that are possible; perhaps we can come up with a logical shape and size.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Henry Batten

3:11 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Clearly we DO NOT need another city.

Carrie Redwine

3:10 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Good Lord this just looks like a mess! One of the major points of our area is that we have the prestige of an Atlanta address! Doesn't Mary Kay Woodworth have anything better to do????

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve Skinner

5:12 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Regrettably, there is little prestige in having an Atlanta address. Bill Campbell, Beverly Hall, et al took care of that. And since when is it un-American to be self-serving? I'm sorta' glad my ancestors decided to secure the blessings of liberty to themselves and to me. Mrs. Woodworth may not have everything perfect just yet, but local control is a good idea. Couldn't this be an improvement over the waste and corruption which we have witnessed in the recent past in DeKalb?

Comment_arrow

Fran

10:53 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Carrie, do you know Mary Kay? She has lived in the Northlake neighborhood for 25+ years, and is a rational, forward thinking person who actively makes a difference, rather than sits back and complains..

RD

3:34 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Mary Kay Woodworth must live in Tucker.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Linda Riche

10:14 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

HAHAHA No Mary Kay Woodworth is also a proponent of in-building -- she lives in the Northlake area on our quaint little lake in Kingscliff in a huge $1,000,000+ mansion that overshadows the other homes on the street, and was built after a lovely home was leveled to the ground. Her kids went to St. Pius so she obviously has no faith in our DeKalb school system. Her husband builds hotels, so could this be a zoning effort for more hotels on his behalf?? This all has a very fishy smell to it - and at the helm: a self serving snob! Please NOOOOO!

Comment_arrow

Henry Batten

11:00 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

I did a Google Maps search for Kingscliff, and without knowing exactly where Mary Kay lived, I could readily pick out her house from the aerial view. What a whopper! I wonder who they paid off to get all those trees cut down next to a lake? They must know how to "work" the system.

Comment_arrow

GT2013

1:51 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Linda, you and Mary Kay Woodworth must be pretty good friends, how else could you know so much about her family? I thought someone else on here said her kids went through public school for the most part - sounds like you know more than them though. Are you going to the meeting tonight? You should give her a piece of your mind - that hotel building husband too! SPEAK THE TRUTH!

Comment_arrow

Fran

2:25 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Linda - get your facts straight - in case you missed this post a few days ago. To dispel any rumor or innuendo about the Woodworths and their involvement in the community - here's just their school history of involvement. Three of their children went K-12, Henderson Mill, Middle, Lakeside. Youngest went k-8 Henderson Mill, Middle. LHS was falling apart at that time between Chelf/Lewis, and youngest went to St. Pius. Mary Kay was actively involved in PTA at all DeKalb schools her children attended, serving as president at each of those multiple years and times. Mark and Mary Kay both have served on school councils at Henderson Mill (Mark still serving), Henderson Middle and Lakeside.

Comment_arrow

Fran

2:28 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

You are correct, though about Mary Kay having no faith in the DeKalb school system - after trying to work with the system for 16+ years, they did send their last kid to private high school. Regarding Mark Woodworth, he is not a hotel builder, developer or broker, but does economic studies and forecasting for the industry nationwide. And as for Kingscliff being "your" quaint little lake, the previous home on the property was a dump and an eyesore, the Woodworth's didn't build it or commission it to be built or pay anyone to remove the trees. The house is a good fit for the street and in the neighborhood, and I should know, I live around the corner from them and presumably you, too.They made a large investment in the community where they now have lived for 27 years, and want to see the community improve, as should every taxpayer in this area. So before you go claiming that they are self-serving and "Northlake bureaucracy", get your facts right. As a matter of fact, call Mary Kay and ask her, she is as open and straightforward a person as you can get.

PJ

3:40 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

It's a shame that most of your see this as self serving when it is a lesson in government and what can happen as result of a community being given the opportunity to express their needs and opinions. Please keep in mind this is in the very early planning portion. Feasabilty hasn't even been determined yet. Go to the 2/13 meeting and become educated on the roots of this proposal.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Henry Batten

3:51 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

As a further "lesson in government" why not spend our time and energy forming a new state in this community to rescue us from the Republican-dominated state government? Then we could undo all the gerrymandered districts and have more local control. I would be much more in favor of that.

Comment_arrow

Crash

7:49 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Where and at what time will the meeting occur?

Bob Anderson

4:00 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

The proposed boundaries shown on the map are purely arbitray and self-serving to the initiaters of this proposal and drawers of the map.

Reply

Jennifer

4:57 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

I believe the intent was not to step on the toes of a Sagamore group that was apparently also already working on a map. The info I read on the Lakeside Alliance's Facebook page stated that they welcome other groups, including Sagamore if they want to be added to the map.

Reply

Lou

4:57 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

I'm completely in agreement with Carrie Redwine. I'm a 40-plus-year homeowner in walking distance of Lakeside High School and Hawthorne Elementary, heavily invested in this community (former PTA president). I'll fight tooth and nail to keep my Atlanta address. I, too, wonder if the ones who started this messy business of a city of "Lakeside" have an Atlanta address to protect?? With all due respect to "Tucker," I think anyone would agree that "Lakeside" sounds better. Why not put all this energy to form a new city into improving the DeKalb County government? This will be a far better investment. Leave my Atlanta address alone--that's why I moved here!! I don't think this new committee knows the can of worms it is opening.

Reply
Comment_arrow

MS

5:37 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

All of the members of the task force have Atlanta addresses. You would still be able to use Atlanta in your address - that's the postal service domain.

Comment_arrow

Sally

7:50 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

This would not change your mailing address. Only the post office can do that.

Comment_arrow

Jennifer

9:12 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Unlike you Lou, I don't believe that any amount of time, devotion or energy is going to fix what's wrong with DeKalb. Co. government and I've lived here nearly my entire life. The county is currently exploring the idea of a city of DeKalb, as in the entire unincorporated county becoming the largest city in the state. This will block any future cityhoods from forming and lock us all into a terrible fate. One point worth noting is that cityhood is the first step toward smaller city school systems, not unlike Decatur City Schools, which I personally believe would be a step in the righting the mess that is DeKalb Co. Schools. I think with thought, collaboration and diligence we can modify this proposal/map into something that most will see as workable.

Comment_arrow

Crash

5:18 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

The reason to give up on DeKalb County is this, there are more people in DeKalb County who think everything is fine than there are people who think things need to improve. The people who believe that things need to improve are outnumbered by the people who think things are fine. Therefore the people who want a better life gather together, take things into their own hands and improve them, and leave the County government to those who think it is just fine. The county doesn't want to help us.

Comment_arrow

Brookhaven

2:01 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Same silly argument we heard in Brookhaven and the Dunwoody folks before us. Since 2008 when Dunwoody formed there have been 2 county elections and here we still are. Changing DeKalb from within is not possible as the electorate here will continue to protect the county as a jobs program . It is just a fact and there is nothing anyone or north or central Dekalb can do about it. For every one "work to change the county voter " there are 10 who will vote to keep the status quo. Municipalization is the only way at present to keep some of your tax dollars locally while transferring the power to utilize those dollars away from the corrupt and incompetent County power structure. Why do you think they don't want any more cities? By incorporating you are simply taking power away from our CEO and bureaucrats and giving it to yourselves.
Advice: clean up your map so that it doesn't cross 1-85 as DECA is a den of mostly radical vipers who will only sap energy and momentum from you.
Get the Tucker and Druid Hills corridor people together to strategize to see if 1 city or 2 cities should be formed. Boundaries are very important to your strategy and one shouldn't just half- ass the proposed map before all issues are worked out.
Prepare for a political campaign by hiring a consultant.
Ask for advice from those who have just completed this process- it can give you a huge leg up.

Comment_arrow

MJF

5:12 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

I do not want a new city in any way! Lets improve what we have!

Comment_arrow

Linda Riche

10:19 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

I totally agree with MJF! and Trish!

Comment_arrow

Lenny

11:47 am on Monday, March 25, 2013

Thanks TRISH.... I agree... Tucker needs to stay the same.. What a jewel we have here.

Cee Gee

6:12 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

I would like to know more about the proposed boundaries and the premise that this is the Lakeside community. It includes parts of Tucker, Druid Hills, and Cross Keys school clusters. I don't usually consider Dresden Rd and Buford Highway, or McClendon Rd and Tucker Library as part of my neighborhood or school community.

Reply

anne

7:37 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Have y/all been wearing blinders? Are you not seeing the corruption in DeKalb? Schools, government ... it's an embarassment. And stop getting your knickers in a twist about Sagamore - who has eliminated much of the Lakeside school district with their own city plan ... but they're upset not to be on this plan? The fact is we need something better than DeKalb is giving us, and this is an opportunity to come together and figure that out so we can thrive instead of being pulled down the drain of this county.

Reply

Tom Doolittle

9:43 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Looking back at my blog:
"The Northlake idea has the added benefit of incorporating Industrial property, a hospital and some railroad tracks (can you say commuter rail station)... You can make a case that a 2-mile radius around Northlake Mall would be the most “complete” of the new cities on an economic asset basis (things that many new cities are very short on)... Since the new city movement is all about breaking all of the rules about what constitutes a city, why not one where the commercial/industrial revenue is twice that of the residential."

Reply

Tom Doolittle

10:02 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

BTW--one of the dangers of having organizations that aren't officially chartered trying to do the public's work (its called "self-appointment"--I know from whence I speak) is that you set yourself up for criticism (hopefully, accollades too) from your neighbors.

I firmly believe this area is unique in many ways--so different that it can safeguard against unnecessary personal attacks--and also set up a process where representatives' mandates are firmly established.

I think this blog (and participants) can do this with respect being a number one priority. It may not have been needed elsewhere, but we can do it better.

Reply

AJ

10:52 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

I live in the area and don't yet have an opinion on the proposal or map. I assume that the map excluded Sagamore and Leafmore because of their apparent interest in their own new city. That seems completely unfeasible due to the lack of tax base and that they would most likely ultimately included if this moved forward.

As to the "Atlanta Address" issue. Sandy Spings still uses an Atlanta address. Heck, anyone can use an Atlanta address just like we do now in unincorporated Dekalb county. We aren't Atlanta now and won't be Atlanta if this happens. So calm down, you can put whatever you want on your magazine subscription so long as the zip code is right.

Reply

Crash

10:57 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Thank you Patch for giving us a forum to exchange ideas!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carrie Redwine

10:47 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Yes Patch this is a much needed forum - thank you!

Tom Doolittle

11:06 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Lou raises an important ethical question--many people move into unincorporated areas for various reasons. They essentially choose a governing jurisdiction--in Lou's case DeKalb County. His property rights are assigned by DeKalb. Is it "right" that someone in Oak Grove (with no current standing to do so) help decide whether lou should join Grove in a new city?

Note--the wider the map casts its net, the less Lou's vote counts in his own behalf. Worse, commercial property owners get absolutley no say whether the disposition of the their property turns over to a new set of citizens.

The map is obviously more important than defining a community boundary (and address)--it defines the fairness in those getting assigned to it. This is something that the legislature competely fails to recognize.

Note: this is NOT the same thing as annexation, where each neighborhood (about 500 people on a GOOD election day decides each neighbors fate)--something inherently fairer--and safer economically moving forward.

Reply

mind springy

12:14 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

I live in the proposed city, as do my parents (whom I spoke to about it). I'm aware that Sandy Springs has been very happy with it, but it sounds like Fulton county was doing a terrible job of keeping things cleaned/maintained/policed prior to their city-hood.

I haven't really had any big problems in my neighborhood. Garbage pickup has been fine. My street was paved about 2 years ago. My own neighborhood hasn't had crime problems, although I know there are sporadic breakins in various neighborhoods.

We're not vehemently against it, but we've not had such problems that were extremely in favor either. I want to know more about the improvements that are forseen by becoming a city.

Reply

Ralph

1:20 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Sounds like a good idea. I would call it Northlake instead of Lakeside. Mosr name recognition, and recognitions that the biggest commercial in the city is Northlake

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Doolittle

5:28 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

no fear--"Lakeside City" won't make the first cut, based on the "street"--many people talking. This is particularly true if two cities are formed with a city moving from Druid Hills into what this map presently includes. It will include Oak Grove and potentially...Lakeside High. However, these still should be the subject of meetings well into the next five years.

Sparrow

4:06 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Don't take century parkway DECA needs it for getting into Chamblee or it should go to Brookhaven. Crossing 285 for just this small segment isn't right.

It also looks like unincorporated areas will be left as islands surrounded by incorporated areas. I thought you can't do that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Henry Batten

5:26 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Dresden East Civic Association

Henry Batten

5:26 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

I can't help myself, but I wanted to add a bit of levity to this discussion. I found this example on YouTube of something DeKalb County has done well:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2xnWYx8YK8

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Doolittle

10:31 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

thank you Henry--knee slapper. Do see it folks. Gawd, one of those gunships just flew over my house on the way to Dobbins.
(anyway--the levity is what separates this community from the others--damn I love this freikin place)

Question

5:37 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

As others have stated above, I'm curious as to the criteria and decision-process in establishing the boundries of the map. For example, we are walking distance to Lakeside High School and are NOT in the boundries, yet Tucker communities are???

Reply

Question

5:49 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Seems the logical criteria to draw the map is to based it on the current Lakeside High School attendance zone or area?

Reply

Deanna

11:35 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

The map is totally unbalanced. It has areas that are not in the lakeside area. Why would 500ft.of Dresden Drive at Chamblee Tucker Rd. Considered lakeside? Sounds like a group of people are having a panic attack over what is happening in DeKalb and not thinking to clearly. This city thing is being hijacked by a few people for gains other than for the betterment of the community as a whole.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sally

8:41 am on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Oh please, look at the boundaries on any city. Look at the Dekalb County boundaries. None of them go in perfect squares or circles. A new city needs a business tax base. Dekalb County has gained the reputation of being unfriendly to business, which is part of their revenue problem. Businesses are moving out of this county. Why shouldn't those commercial areas be included? They are in our neighborhood. A city will not be able to survive without a business tax base. If we are to have a city, it needs to start off on a good standing.

That said, I have no doubt that if this proposal actually happens, it won't look exactly like this first map that is being proposed. You need something to begin the discussion with.

Comment_arrow

Tom Doolittle

1:18 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Deanna:
pls attend the meeting--my read on your comment is less than that of the map but of the panic. Recent confluence of events may actually not deserve extreme action--and is more a way to have people fall in line.
I cannot see why this movement can't take a cautious approach while we see what happens to the economy (further contraction affecting property values--and people's values for that matter) and watch the effect on Brookhaven--and I believe most importantly, take advantage of the position of strength we have with the county government--they will do anything to keep us from being the next domino to fall.

Comment_arrow

Linda Riche

10:26 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Deanna you are 100% correct! These school districts are not the priority here - Mary Kay Woodworth had her kids at St. Pius, as did Levitas and most likely the others on this board. This is a self serving project for those initiating it! The Northlake Bureaucracy!

Tom Doolittle

3:14 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Love the guys who don't understand the common post-1950's bonds that built the Druid/Briarcliff/Lavista/Tucker corridor--and why that will be the difference between politicizing a city-hood "movement" here and Dunwoody and Brookhaven.

The bonds are shaped by local organizations like the churches and soccer leagues--cutting across high school districts that are ironic partners. The employment centers of the feds and Emory create a unique "same-source" population (we saw this in DC when the CIA hired tens of thousands in the 1950s--created a pulse of new families that essentially was a fraternity.)

Maybe most unique of all are the numbers of third-generation residents--for a suburb, its unheard of. Heck--the original residents never moved--for 45 years!!! Talk about glue. Second, the kids grew up, many stayed, but many that grew up came back within blocks of their parents homes. The second generation practically invented the "buy your parent's" homes movement.

Remarkably, an area of such "sameness" is not not a monolith.
(1) From Druid Hills moving "outward" toward Tucker, its voting patterns swing from left to right.
(2)This is not a population that is easily "managed"--practically chaotic with many chief and no Indians.
(3) We vote. A special election will not assist a city vote here.

Vinson, Brookhaven's consultant said in the Buckhead Chamber video. The city-hood movement ends at I-85. Tucker maybe--BriarPatch fuggetaboutit without a looooonngg haul.

Reply

Steve Markowitz

3:25 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Question: Is the propised City of Lakeside different from the proposed City of DeKalb? I attended the meeting at Oak Grove United Methodist Church regarding the City of Dekalb which was very informative of how new cities are formed. I hope this meeting will be able to present both sides of the issue.

Reply

MJF

5:18 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

We are incredibly happy with Dekalb and everything about Embry Hills. Please leave us out of this. We have a close community and don't need people who want what is best only for them to ruin things for everyone.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Linda Riche

10:27 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Once again MJF we are in agreement!

PJ

6:44 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Would a new school district be considered? Frankly I don't know if Dunwoody has considered one? I would think there is a great opportunity to sucede from the "mess we call DCS"!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Linda Riche

10:29 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Well if you don't like it here - move to Fulton County! Or Cobb! Or Cherokee! Or Gwinnett! Or put your kids in St. Pius!

Tom Doolittle

11:34 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

We can separate this blog from the rest by respecting people who risk their relationships with their closest neighbors by trying to initiate a conversation and come up with a common agenda.

If we can arrest a responsible process--and make that the first priority, that gets rid of the fear (and anger) and sets a foundation for addressing common sense alternatives--like using this time and the unlikely probability of gaining a majority vote--to tell the legislature its time to look at other states' municipalization laws--they are much more responsible and focus on transferring most responsiilites to cities that are MANDATED to be formed SIMULTANEOUSLY and avoid the domino effect. They also set up transition periods.

The processes forcing this issue in Dunwoody and particularly Brookhaven were not fair and public conversation was ugly and divisive. We can do better--ours can be as unique as this area always has been.

How many of you have heard people say--"this area is the world's greatest kept secret"? Maybe we ought to ask ourselves why that is and make that our foundational question.

Reply

Tom Doolittle

8:00 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

From the article above:
"The non-profit, chaired by Northlake-area resident Mary Kay Woodworth, will hold its first public meeting at Lakeside High on Feb. 13 from 7 p.m. - 8 p.m. It released the following statement Wednesday"....

Reply

GT2013

12:49 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

I seem to recall three of Woodworth's children going through Lakeside..

Reply

Fran

2:57 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Linda - to dispel any rumor or innuendo about the Woodworths and their involvement in the community - here's just their school history of involvement. Three of their children went K-12, Henderson Mill, Middle, Lakeside. Youngest went k-8 Henderson Mill, Middle. LHS was falling apart at that time between Chelf/Lewis, and youngest went to St. Pius. Mary Kay was actively involved in PTA at all DeKalb schools her children attended, serving as president at each of those multiple years and times. Mark and Mary Kay both have served on school councils at Henderson Mill (Mark still serving), Henderson Middle and Lakeside. So before you go claiming that they are self-serving and "Northlake bureaucracy", get your facts right.

Reply

Ellen Zegura

5:45 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

From my standpoint (working mom with two K-12 kids), there are three important things that local government has some control over: schools, sanitation, and policing. I am dismayed by Dekalb County's school board, but a new city will not change that, and our local schools are excellent despite the school board. The local schools need our energy and resources (time and money) to remain that way. I am completely satisfied with Dekalb County sanitation -- curbside recycling is wonderful, we have 2x week trash, they are reliable. Our crime rate is low. Where is the pressing need that a new city would be certain to meet?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sally

8:22 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

No, a new city will not change the school situation immediately. But it's one step toward changing it. All of the schools in this area are not great. Some are, that's true. Hawthorne.... not so much. But, that's a different subject. The point I wanted to make was, it won't matter how great the schools are if the whole system loses accreditation.

We are likely to lose 2x week trash pick up sooner rather than later. Just my opinion. With the revenue problems Dekalb County has I don't see how they can continue that. We will see though.

Finally, low crime????? Not sure where you live or what you consider low crime. The crime in this neighborhood has increased considerably in the past 10 years. Maybe we have different perspectives on what low crime is.

Comment_arrow

Henry Batten

9:32 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Sally, I don't know where you live, but here in LaVista Park we are immediately adjacent to the City of Atlanta. We have very little crime here and it has "decreased" in the past 10 years, inspite of living next to Sin City.

If any of you think that a new city is going to change the school system situation, have you looked at what the City of Decatur taxes are to support their independant school system? Last I read they are the highest in the entire state. I thought the idea behind cityhood was to lower taxes.

As far as 2x trash pickup, since we started recycling, we only have to put out "trash" every two weeks. The vast majority of what we dispose of is recyclables. This was one of the major reasons the county commission made recyling free, and it saves the county money. So where is the City of Lakeside going to dispose of its trash???

Comment_arrow

Sally

7:12 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Henry, I live in the boundaries of the proposed City of Lakeside. Crime in this area has skyrocketed. I've lived here for nearly 20 years. For a long time, hearing of car break ins and home break ins were shocking and rare. Now, it's pretty much a weekly occurrence. Not to mention people being held up at gunpoint in the various shopping center parking lots. Those are an example of the most common.

Decatur schools may costs more. But they also do a good job. I don't necessarily mind paying more taxes if I see the benefits that come from it. Would a new school system costs more? Possibly. But, I think that $20 million text book order approved by the Dekalb BOE that never produced new text books would go along way toward paying for a new system.

I was happy with Dekalb County governance for many years. That quickly changed when Vernon took over. And not much has changed since he left. Ride down to south Dekalb and look at what your tax dollars have been paying for. And Arts Center, nice sidewalks. While my neighborhood has pot holes and a few crumbling sidewalks. I'm over it! Time to move on.

BTW, if you aren't in the proposed boundaries, not sure why you are concerned.

Comment_arrow

Ellen Zegura

9:22 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

This is a well-done web site that shows crime statistics by geographical area. You can select the time period you are interested in as well as the type of crime.

http://www.crimemapping.com/map/ga/dekalbcounty

Comment_arrow

Henry Batten

5:43 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Sally, I am concerned because if Lakeside becomes a city, my area becomes squeezed between it on the east, Brookhaven and the north, the city of Atlanta on the west, and Emory on the south. There is no way that this tiny area could survive as a city on its own, and we would be left with the aftermath. And as I understand from other's postings, the map is not set in stone. I still live in DeKalb County, how about you?

Comment_arrow

Sally

7:37 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Harry, as I said, I live in the proposed boundaries. BTW, Emory is not a city.

I'm not necessarily pulling for this particular map or city. I am a proponent of stripping Dekalb County of every possible bit of power. I would be happy being annexed into something already existing. Chamblee, Brookhaven. Something. If this trend continues, your area will be picked up by some city. I understand why you are concerned about being left out in the cold. I have had the same concerns.

Comment_arrow

Tom Doolittle

9:02 am on Thursday, February 14, 2013

Sally has the right idea about "stripping" county government of its power--except the notion under state law (and how it might be clarified--amended) should be followed. That takes time to do constitutionally--and rightfully so.

Local control as merged with "the county unit" are fundamental to the Georgia Constitution. There is no "city system"--at least as a fundamental premise. Cities serve at county units pleasure. The county unit essentially cannot be replaced in this state--and is only tinkered with "one city domino at a time" with grave unforseen circumstances.

Under this system, the state can only legally mandate and regulate counties. It cannot negotiate with interest groups seeking to charter cities (even tho the recent spate of working with civic groups to arbitrarily define new cities has been done under "tinkering" processes--the process witll be challenged in the highest court if this business continues).

A statewide referendum is now needed to force COUNTIES to devolve their power in counties over a certain population that has been providing city-like services--or population density. Entire counties would be divided into cities under comprehensive land use law. This is known as "municipalization", not the arbitrary "domino city" that has been used (it amounts to financial blackmail).

Forcing the devolution of power (over say 10 years) would take away the convenient excuse that Dunwoody originally used--that the county wouldn't cooperate.

Tom Doolittle

6:05 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

should be a great meeting tomorrow (Wed 2/13) at Lakeside High 7:00

Reply

Crash

7:45 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

The map excludes me by one street. I'll be at tonight's meeting!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ellen Zegura

2:47 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

My two cents: discussions about the map boundaries are putting the cart before the horse. First should come a discussion of the costs and benefits of creating a city.

Comment_arrow

Tom Doolittle

3:18 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

continuing with Ellen...and the risks of moving forward in too short a time. Risks of loss of political capital if a vote fails...either the first vote or second. Financial risks also abound--the least of which is continued economic contraction.

Hutch

3:45 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Why was this meeting set up on Ash Wednesday? Was it for some specific reason? Invited some neighbors to come, but they could not because they were going to an Ash Wednesday service. A lot of folks who may have been there will be in church, and not there to give valuable input. Hmm.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Doolittle

11:06 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Great turnout in numbers tho. Hall seats 500--I'd say 350 were there. Meeting was smooth--1 hr. Not much grumbling. People were respectful.
Probably answered more than 30 questions from cards handed in from the audience. That was half the meeting.
I'd take the Alliance at its word--the map is totally in flux...and there will be other organizations/movements with other proposals.

Crash

6:11 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

How about a County named Lakeside?!?!?!?!

Reply

kudzuqueen

2:16 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Where does this plan leave those of us between Clairmont and LaVista? Toco Hill/Executive Park area. We aren't 'Druid Hills'. A significant commercial area. Are we to form our own city? Is that what is meant by comments like 'Sagamore Hills is considering its own city?

Reply

kudzuqueen

2:36 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Perhaps this answers my question. So we are now Lindbergh-LaVista. Difficult to stay informed.

An alternative city map has been put forward by the North Druid Hills Study Group. We have origins in StandUp DeKalb,Inc., the organization that opposed the Sembler redevelopment of Adams Stadium and Kittredge etc. in 2007-08. Our map actually includes the DeKalb neighborhoods in the Lindbergh-LaVista Corridor Coalition and several major Lakeside High neighborhoods which were also excluded by the Lakeside “Alliance.” Though we have been working with civic leaders since January on city hood, we are just now getting a website where we can post this. Please check back for more info and a link. We want your feedback.
Thanks. — Don Broussard

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Doolittle

3:36 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Thanks for keeping Patch informed Don. May be a priority for whatever organizations or discussion groups to stay in touch, if not work together and/or negotiate. It would be inconceivable for communities with obvious historical affinity not to stay together--at least in the "dicussion" stages (and I do stress the plural).

I still look at the area of affinity in terms of original suburban high school zones--Druid Hills/Briarcliff/Lakeside/Henderson/Tucker.

Briarcliff grads now live in Lakeside/Tucker. Their kids played in the same soccer leagues--a great number of church pops are led by people who straddle the whole community. Its a three generation (going on four) suburban area--maybe the only one like it in the US.

Asking ourselves what the nature of the affinity is and defining the entire east side I-85 Lavista Corridor's character elements will be key to defining jurisdictions (in whatever alternative formal form the jurisdictions take).

kudzuqueen

3:44 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

To clarify--I reposted Don Broussard's comment--I checked several sites--NDHRA, Merry Hills and Lindbergh La Vista--I am fairly certain the comment was posted somewhere on that site. Not certain of much at present--living in some sort of limbo.
http://lindberghlavista.org/

Reply

kudzuqueen

3:48 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

It also seems that this group held a meeting in Jan at Oak Grove Methodist church--general discussion on forming cities and a City of North DeKalb. As much discussion as there has been concerning the future development of the former Briarcliff High School I would hope there are a number of very concerned citizens in this area.
Any 'clues' as to what one day be done with BHS would be appreciated by many---fwiw.

Reply

Tom Doolittle

3:49 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Required reading for anyone interested in discussing city-making. Note--almost all formative work (the stuff that creates "bones" in a community) was done with a recalcitrant legislature. Now the same excesses exist in the other direction. Making up for lost time is not a prescription for success.

http://encycl.opentopia.com/term/Sandy_Springs,_Georgia

Reply

Leave a comment