POLL: Would a City of Lakeside Be Too White?
The city, as it is currently proposed, would be about two-thirds white, said a former state representative last week.
Hundreds of residents turned out last week for the biggest meeting yet regarding the creation of a new city in northern DeKalb County. It was hosted by the newly created Lakeside City Alliance, which is investigating the possibility of starting a new city that would encompass much of the Lakeside High School attendance zone but also stretch west toward Century Center and east toward west Tucker.
At the end of the meeting, former state Rep. Kevin Levitas, one of the alliance's organizers, raised the issue of race in this proposed city. Under its current proposed boundaries, he said, Lakeside would be about two-thirds white, roughly 17 percent black, roughly 17 Hispanic and the rest would be of various other racial groups. (He admitted those numbers, off the top of his head, didn't add up to 100 percent.)
"I've heard from some folks down at the capitol that it's an all-white city, and it's not," Levitas said.
Assuming Levitas' rough numbers are relatively accurate, it raises an important question: Would Lakeside be too white? Does that matter, and, if it does, why? Tell us in the comments section below.
Lee-Ann
6:44 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
The whole "mini-city" idea is white vs. black. If this were an all-white county, it'd (only) be rich vs. poor, but racial politics add another layer here. The state needs to regularize this process and stop the wealthiest parts of the county from taking their toys and going home.
Kay Clark
7:03 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
I totally agree. It really is as much an issue of class as it is race. These boundaries weren't abritrary. The Lakeside Alliance appears to only want the "most desirable" demographics in class and race.
Annabeth Balance
9:47 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
I agree with Lee-Ann. Thank you for having the courage to speak up.
Herman Lorenz
12:13 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
We're already home, thank you.
Tom L.
7:04 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Really? Isn't that, at its core, a racist question... no matter who asks it? Is the city of Atlanta too black. Come on people. The problems leading to a desire to create the city of Lakeside (a desire I do not share, though I live in its proposed boundaries) is NOT a question of race. It is a question of character. Duplicitous behavior on the part of leadership is an abomination regardless of the color, age, sex, or any other divisive way of looking at people. When are you people going to get this distraction and recognize that both our county leadership and our school board leadership has been, and still is unworthy of our support. The moment you mark this as an issue of race you bind subsequent leaders with a stereotype that limits their ability to freely lead with class and character. Please...
Christine Callaway
9:35 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Amen brother!!
Annabeth Balance
9:55 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Come on, Tom L. Atlanta is so largely black not because black people chose to form the city that way, it is largely black because so many white people left the city. So it is a matter of impetus -- whose initiative has it been to make which moves?
And neither case has to do with character of leadership. That is a totally separate issue, and one that must only and always be dealt with by the voters of whatever jurisdiction. The DeKalb School Board's behavior has been atrocious, and should be dealt with appropriately -- the recent Chair's stepping down was a good first step, but certainly not the whole solution. WE the voters need to be present in that matter if we want the outcome to reflect our views.
Sally
7:45 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Really??? This is the best ya'll can come up with? And you want us to take this website seriously?
Carrie Redwine
11:23 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Amen!
Lucas Roberts
8:28 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
This is a pretty poor topic. I agree with Tom. How about a story on the other group trying to make a city or even a story about what Lakeside could base there model after.
This is just trying to throw gas onto a fire for no reason other than to see a reaction.
I really wanted a to see the real topics discussed - not this.
How about a deep dive onto the pro's and con's of adding a police force, parks and rec, and zoning?
Should the boundary be from 285 to Toco - is that really the community?
Tons of questions that could be discussed.
JayMan
8:40 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Jonathan,
Can you explain what you mean by "too white"?
Also, Do you know if there are any polls on the patch asking if any DeKalb cities are "too black'?
Jonathan Cribbs
10:34 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
I'm going to assume this question is rhetorical. Read my comment below.
Crash
9:03 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Jonathan,
You are WAY off the mark with this question. I'm disappointed.
Herman Lorenz
9:03 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
What a crock. If Mr Cribbs doesn't like the people who live here, or would like to force some people to move, just say so! And while he's at it, could he please force some people in Decatur to move out because it's too "black"; And maybe Chamblee has too many Asians. Mr Cribbs will have a busy time.
Tom Doolittle
9:42 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
This is like mentioning religion at a neighborhood cocktail party. People jump without really considering the question and implications. I think the topic gets at the core of what divides us and obviously many experts, sociologists, educators and researchers think so because entire conferences are organized around racial divisions.
Maybe its too sensitive for neighborhood civic ("good news" boosterism) media outlet. If you want uniformity of thought, read (and be led) by the Dunwoody Crier. In my view, this community is capable and ready for this topic. For intellectual capacity and diversity of thought this place is second to none.
Race is one subject (maybe not "issue" per se) that is at the core of the city-making DEBATE, if only to fully examine the motivations behind it. Jonathan might come up with another question about motives later. The subject is newsworthy--it has been mentioned, even if tangentially in articles about other cities.
The important thing is not that the area's pop differences can't "work" as a city, nor that new affluent cities want separation from adjacent areas with higher pops of different ethnicity. It is a Democrat black-led county government that is considered incompetent and marching to the beat of a different drum. The city-making leadership has always been white and Republican.
BTW--the demog of the current Lakside map is about the same as Sandy Springs, but nowhere near as white as Dunwoody.
H.A. Hurley
9:54 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Unreal! DCS and DC are in quicksand and residents have just had enough. Incompetence is incompetence. Enough already with the cheap shots of racial divides. All DC communities should rise up and expose the thievery, corruption and irresponsible behaviors. Not enough are doing it. If those of you who have had it, have two options: move or do something about it. Stop bit***ng and get off your complaining behinds and go to Plan B. Lakeside has every right to get on with it and make life better. We have all waited for DCS and DC to improve....still waiting. Stop the race bating, every child in DCS is being hurt, every property is impacted, every resident has a responsibility to do something. If it continues this way, we may have more communities springing up like spring flowers. Doing nothing is hoping for a better outcome by doing the exact same thing. I applaud Brookhaven, Lakeside, Dunwoody, etc. at least they are alive and know they deserve better. Get off your behinds and do SOMETHING!
Enuff Govt Already
10:24 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
If we asked then I guess we already knew the answer. It's not the demographics of the govt or the type of govt. It is the people we elect. We can break down DeKalb to a level where every street is its own municipality but that act will not eliminate the problems. If the NEW and more govt goes bad then what?
Herman Lorenz
10:48 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
It's a lot easier to change a government of 60,000 neighbors than a government of 800,000 who have a completely different perspective, and control the outcome.
Enuff Govt Already
11:18 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Your making the assumption that 60K in "neighbors" will always hold the same views as you. There is NO difference in the way one changes a govt of 60K, 880K or the 300M unless someones decides who can and can not vote. What next, the predominately white cities of north DeKalb start pushing for a new county? The NEW city of JC wants to amend its charter so it can raise taxes easier, the new city of B'haven wants to amend its charter to strike the ban on term limits, D'woody is trying to get back into the real estate speculation biz. We need to be eliminating govts not creating more of them.
Herman Lorenz
12:17 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
There is, in fact, a big difference in the way you can change a local city government compared to the DeKalb County government. A small group can be influenced by the local residents. There is no way to have an affect on DeKalb County government the way the voting districts are set up. If you live in this area, try running for CEO and see what happens.
Jonathan Cribbs
10:30 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
In the interest of not responding to each question that's been directed at me, I'll just respond once right here. People seem to think the poll question is inappropriate and that I raised it here to stir the hornet's nest. Not the case. A few things:
1) Make sure you've read the second paragraph of this post and Levitas' quote. That's the primary reason I asked the poll question. He raised the issue, so I asked the question. Pretty simple.
2) Even if Levitas didn't ask it, I might have asked down the road anyway. Demographics are a potent and important part of this larger issue and will be raised in myriad other ways over the course of this cityhood exploration, I'm sure. The question in the headline may be worded in a blunt way, but, first, it's a headline, and, second, It merely echoes what Levitas claimed some legislators in the Gold Dome were saying.
3) A few comments are saying I have some position on this. I do not. And for that matter, I don't have any opinion about cityhood either. For someone so involved in all of this, you won't find a person less likely to be affected by it. I'm single, I don't have children and I don't own property around here. You can safely assume I see this issue objectively and dispassionately.
JayMan
10:53 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
actually Levitas responded to a statement about it being an "all white city". He responded it was not! Then you opened it back up by asking if it was "too white". Can you explain what YOU mean by "too white"?
Jonathan Cribbs
11:11 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
I think I've explained the poll sufficiently, but if you really want to break it down, here goes: Levitas said he believes the city, as proposed, would be sufficiently diverse. He claimed some critics said otherwise. My poll merely references the statistics Levitas repeated and then, in the interest of including everyone, directs the question at this site's readership. Is the proposed city too white? Should it be more diverse? I think it's fairly clear.
JayMan
11:27 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
So based of the question you believe that some cities can be "too white" ? If Lakeside becomes a city, is it one of the cities that are, in fact, "too white"?
Maybe they should re-draw the lines, since they have obviously exceeded the total for allowable whites in a proposed city.
Jonathan Cribbs
11:35 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
JayMan, my question wasn't loaded, and it isn't some disguised statement. You're digging into me here as if you're going to uncover some bias or agenda on my part. There isn't one. I'm not making suggestions. I thought it was an interesting question to put before the readership of this site.
JayMan
11:42 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Just proving the obvious double standard. You would never post a headline "Would a City of _____ be too black"?
JayMan
3:14 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
and your question/poll was certainly loaded......
Yes, it is too white.
No, it is not too white.
I dont know if it is too white.
It doesnt matter to me if it is too white.
You base it off the belief that a city can be too white...
Ralph
11:12 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Don't see that racial percentages have any bearing here. Qestion is whether a local nighborhood can form as a city to have some local control over use of its resourses. Think we need bettr police protection, more and better public parks and better zonng decisions. Those are the real issues.
Carrie Redwine
11:29 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
I'm not sure how much better our police system can be for the area - we are just a few miles from the entire Dekalb County police department off Crescent, behind Target. And there is the Fire Station on Mercer University Drive that responds to any medical emergency. Both police and medical have proven very efficient and timely in our experiences in our 13 years in the community.
Herman Lorenz
12:23 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Since our house has been broken into five times, I thought I'd add a comment that when I worked off Pleasant Hill road and got the calls from the alarm company, I beat Dekalb police, or arrived at the same time to my house. On the three breakins in one week, not one officer was aware of the previous breakins; not one had any desire to collect evidence; and not one was interested in the fact that they had left notes. We collected the evidence ourselves and gave the names to precinct; then they took action.
Harry
1:31 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
What does "sufficiently diverse" mean? and who decides?
H.A. Hurley
3:00 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
With our county going down the tube, we sure don't need to spend any more time discussing the most tired topic of white vs black or black vs white. As Chris Christy would say: SHUT UP! We have one of the worst school systems anywhere, and we are wasting time? While we type and respond, the DCS BOE is spending more of ALL our tax $$ going to court. They fall asleep in meeting, blow every penny of textbook $, illegally spent Title1 $, reduce technologists and underpay them, teachers have salaries from year 2000, teachers will leave, residents will leave and kids will fail. The only ones THRIVING...THRIVING, are the long list of SUPERINTENDENTS, their cronies and the DumbAsDirt BOE President. Please, all take a one way trip to Nepal, I would even contribute to that venture.
Nancy Jonas
3:15 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
New poll question:
Is DeKalb County not black enough?
Nancy Jonas
3:17 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Your poll is a joke, provides no information to the community.
There goes the patch, deleted from my bookmarks.
Jeep Hook
3:39 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
What is joke is the idea of group of white folks trying to land grab and create some false cityhood idea to serve their own racist protectionist ideas! Work within the system to make it better for all.
GES
7:23 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Sometimes it is easier to start over fresh than try to re-build a broken & corrupt system such as DeKalb County.
Being of Apache descent I am kind of on the outside looking through the window here in Atlanta. I see both white and black Racism however most of it really comes from the elected officials in DeKalb County and their cronyism. (I have seen the same thing while working at the Capitol for a Wire Service the last 13 years) Some DeKalb officials should just be in Jail instead of office!
Jeep, you may want to check you Racism in the Mirror before calling out others for just wanting change! Also, I do not care who you are or what color you may be, you have not experienced the type of loss nor Genocide my ancestors have endured in the last 500 years in what is now the USA!
H.A. Hurley
4:51 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Jonathan, at times, some questions are best left alone. It may have gotten the Patch some press, but we as a people have not grown as much as we may think. Many issues go right down racial lines, no matter how much we don't want them to. The biggest issue for me is that DC used to very prosperous, with an outstanding school system and many newcomers to Atlanta made sure they moved to DC. Today, that is not true and things have gotten so BAD, that children from all corners of the US and the world are getting a marginal education in DC. Not because our kids can't learn, not because teachers are bad, but because the lost $$, stolen$$, lost and stolen textbook $$, technology $$, teacher salary $$, infrastructure and crappy building $$, INFLATED ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF $$$$$.... but, because they are ALL bleeding us to death. We are all losing out and anyone who has options ought to fight, move or become another city or homeschool, or go to private school. Fighting has basically not worked. The former Super and current BOE were so thick skinned, brazen and entitled to hold their breath and spend more $$ in legal battles. Race is the least of our issues right now. The quality of EVERYTHING in DC is at stake, and it looks sooooooooo grim.
Kay Clark
6:50 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Do you seriously believe that teachers make too much money, that there is too much administration for the workload and that there is too much technology available to students? Please explain on what you are basing these beliefs. I leave the rest of your wild conjecture alone...
You rant like you are on a street corner. It doesn't add to the dialogue.
Lou
5:17 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Did Jesse Jackson visit the Patch today? Sounds more like a question he would ask. A sad day....
Brett
5:48 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Jonathon - You were obviously trying to "stir the hornets nest" when you wrote this headline. If you weren't, you're judgment is far too poor for you to write them.
H.A. Hurley
7:41 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Kay Clark~ I think exactly the opposite: DCS has squandered away $ for teachers, salaries basically frozen since 2000, tech, books, infrastructure, libraries, teacher materials, everything related to schools, teaching, and educ kids. Yes, DCS is TOO TOP HEAVY with additional layers of administrators. Compare other systems and you will not find such waste of $$. Remember, Atkinson was sending 9 principals to Mercer for PhDs with RTTT $. Title1 $ was stolen!! Want more? Can't find anything BOE & Supers did that benefitted our kids. Out damn spot!!!
Kay Clark
5:10 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Thank you for the clarification. I didn't get that out of your original post.
Just saying "TOO TOP HEAVY" doesn't mean anything. What layers are unnecessary and why?
GES
8:04 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Kay, HA is absolutely right!
Do you seriously want to reward people that fail our children! DeKalb County is not getting the job done, so yes administration & teachers are making too much money, for the product they are giving to the tax payers! The answer is not to throw more money at the problem, but to make better use of the monies they receive. This starts with DBOE to stop wasting, stealing and throwing money away!
Kay, do we really need to tell you how much money the DBOE has wasted?
H.A. Hurley
8:27 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Please hear this! TEACHERS ARE NOT MAKING TOO MUCH MONEY! Just the opposite. DCS will be losing teachers to other metro school systems. Wages not competitive and basically frozen for years. With all the crap going on, and underpaying the teachers and technology specialists, overpaying extra layers of administrators at the central office, along with thievery of everything mentioned before...DCS is on life support and we have no organ donors. Please pay your teachers and folks on the front lines OR they will leave. I would if I were in their shoes. BOE has barely awakened from its nap and they are suing and wasting more $$$. Their incompetence is costing us millions.
Kay Clark
5:15 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Yes. You do need to state "how much money the DBOE has wasted" if you want to be taken seriously. Just saying that they are "wasting, stealing and throwing money away" is nothing more than an unsubstantiated opinion. Facts add to creating a realistic dialogue that can fix things, sweeping statements don't.
Then again, the proposed small town of Lakeside won't run its own schools so all of this discussion is neither here nor there anyway.
H.A. Hurley
5:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Advice taken. However, the details have been common knowledge for everyone within a 3000 mi radius and beyond. Their acts have been carved into granite, marble, written on parchment, rice paper, iCloud, translated into 60+ languages, etc. Sweeping statements? The details are also too long and will take up everyone's GB.
Lakeside would still be part of DCS, but at least they are getting off their behinds and are doing SOMETHING. Thanks for your help.
Kay Clark
5:57 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
It's seems we favor far different styles of communication. Since I'm low on parchment and rice paper resources I'm no more informed or convinced of anything than I was before this thread was created.
A kneejerk reaction to just do..."SOMETHING" can create more even more problems. I don't back that method of change. Reason and facts not hyperbole should the way adults communicate and decide plans of action.
GES
7:36 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Kay, obliviously Radio, TV & internet are not your styles of communication either. Otherwise, you would know the amount of waste and corruption that has been going on for years in the DeKalb County school system!
But hey, if you have been living under a rock for years, I can’t help that, and I will not debate a rock either!
Kay Clark
1:47 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
GES, I'll just assume that being able to make succinct statements of fact aren't your style.
I'm not sure why you assume we are "debating." I don't believe that I've defended DBOE at any point. I've simply asked for factual information to But that's cool. Continue on with your sweeping statements, lack of factual information and assumptions (insults?) about your neighbors all while not doing so under a real name.
JayMan
2:19 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
yall are way off topic...Let get back to the question at hand!
Does the proposed city of Lakeside exceed the total for allowable Whites? Thus, making it too White?
GES
2:14 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Like I said Kay it would be a wast of time, it is all public information, do your own leg work--let your fingers do the walking!
FYI, that is my real name, as I always use my initials. I know my neighbors around me and thank God you are not one of them!
Kay Clark
2:33 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013
Right. Working with facts is a waste of time, but generalities aren't. Makes total sense. The insults are also quite classy.
How about this, you ignore me and I ignore you? That can make for great neighborhood relations.
Brett
4:36 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013
Can we come to some kind of agreement here? Don't we all agree nothing good can from a city filled with too many white people? Oh, and the rent is too damn high?
Marv Peck
12:35 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I am very concerned about this issue and will be present at tonight's meeting. One thing should be made clear. The creation of a city called Lakeside, will not impact the school system. All of the schools will remain as DeKalb county schools. I do agree with the headline. All of the cities that have been created lately have been in the affluent areas. There have been no efforts in the less affluent areas. That does break this down into a racial issue.
GES
12:44 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Sounds more like a wealth issue, and a who Wants to be more active in the Community type issue to me, than a Race issue!
Race is only an issue if you let it be an issue!
JayMan
12:46 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Marv,
How many whites should be allowed per city?
Herman Lorenz
12:48 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Marv:
I think it's obvious that any new city is likely to be in the more educated and affluent areas. That's not a positive or negative; it's just a fact. If you look at the unincorporated area of DeKalb, you're going to find lots of relatively affluent areas. The less affluent demographic areas appear to already be in the existing cities, or immediately around them. Some of those areas have been considered areas for annexation to the existing cities.
Ralph
1:21 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
If people of a community want to incorporate, what does it matter what race tgey are. I see this as a non-issue and keep womdering why it is even being brought up.
Marv Peck
5:02 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I don't know why it's obvious that new cities would only be in affluent areas. The only thing that seems obvious about that is they have more money and want to keep it so they want to split off from the rest of county. Almost all of southern DeKalb is unicorporated and less affluent than Northern DeKalb. In addition you could draw a line at Memorial Drive and find that the North is white and affluent and the South is African_American and non-afflfuent. That is an over-simplification but I think it does demonstrate part of what is going on with the drive to create new cities,
GES
5:43 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Marv, Sounds like you just want to make it into a Racial issue, where there is not one. Why is that?
I do not know where you live, but here there are middle class Black and white people, plenty of both types around me, some are even of Hispanic & Asian decent. I have even seen 2 Native Americans, if you include me! I would like to see more Native Americans around town though!
I will agree with you that southern DeKalb is less affluent than Northern DeKalb, but I have seen some poor white people living there too!
You might want to work on your Racial insecurities Marv.
Brett
5:50 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Marv - I'm not sure I'm getting your point. I already know it's wrong to be white and earn a good living. But is it also wrong to want to keep what you've earned?
Herman Lorenz
6:51 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Marv:
I don't want to beat this to death. But there is nothing stopping anyone anywhere from getting a group together to create a city. If that's a group in this area, it's going to be on average well off (if you ignore their mortgages). If it's a group south of Decatur it's probably not as well off. But if they want to do it, more power to them.