patching...
Update: Have you liked us on Facebook? Do it! It's the easiest way to stay connected to our content. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

POLL: Would You Like to See a City of Lakeside?

Two days after the Lakeside City Alliance announced its arrival, Patch asks its readers.

  • Would you like to see a City of Lakeside?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        25 (43%)
    • No
        24 (42%)
    • I don't know.
        8 (14%)
    Total votes: 57
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
 

The Lakeside City Alliance announced its creation this week and said it plans to study the feasibility of a new city in north DeKalb County that would be based partly on Lakeside High School's attendance zone.

But Patch wants to know what you think. The proposed city's map is posted on the group's website. 

After you vote, tell us what you think in greater detail in the comments section below.

Related Topics: Lakeside City Alliance

Lucas Roberts

6:16 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

As the lines are drawn now - No.
I'm for the idea of some idea of cityhood, but It needs to be inside 285 and include most to N. Druid Hills.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Crash

8:21 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

It does. From what I've heard, the south border is Clairmont, the east border is Lawrenceville Hwy, the west border is I-85....the north border is.......

Sally

7:27 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Something needs to happen. Might not have to be this exactly. But something to get us out of the clutches of Dekalb County needs to happen.

Reply

Herman Lorenz

7:43 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Some version of a city is clearly useful. I certainly have my own ideas of the size and shape; but getting the discussion going is the most important element now.

Also don't think the name "Lakeside" works, since it would be identified with the school, and I don't think any version of a city will end up matching Lakeside's geography. The published map includes part of Lakeside's area and part of Tucker HS area.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Crash

8:23 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Lakeside refers to the "Lake" or glorified pond just down from the school. I think the name is fine.

Comment_arrow

HamBurger

10:26 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Mr. Crash, Lakeside (the school) was named due to its proximity to the now drained lake between the school and Starfire Drive. The mud hole you refer to is Simmons Lake, once a very nice fishing pond until the dam for the lake behind Lakeside broke and filled it in destroying the pond and creating a mud hole.

By the way, if you see a shadowy figure with a gig and a flashlight moving around that mud hole at night, it’s just me. There are some nice sized bullfrogs with some really wonderful looking legs living around that Simmons mud hole. And I just cannot help myself. Sorry to see that Doreen Lake is coming to an end of its life as well.

Regarding names for your new city, maybe you could name it after Echo Lake? Or better yet, how about Woodworthville? Similar to how many of your northward neighbors refer to their new city as Jacobsville!

Special hamburger and a Cheerwine anyone?

Comment_arrow

full1726

11:04 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

I don't like the name either. It shouldn't be named after a pond that is pretty much non-existent these day. It should be something that identifies with popular neighborhoods in the area ...Oak Grove, Northlake, even something like LaVista. "Lakeside" is pretty much a misnomer.

Comment_arrow

Bill Lowe

1:44 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Hamburger,

Interesting that you know about the Lakeside story and actually know the name of the lake behind the castle house. I grew up losing many shoes in the swamp on the back side of Doreen. I Have these ultra vivid memories of sinking knee deep in the muck, pulling my feet out, the sound that it made while doing so, and the irretrievable shoe down in the hole.

Do I know you?

Comment_arrow

HamBurger

9:36 am on Saturday, February 9, 2013

“Do I know you?”

Mr. Bill, I have wondered that myself . . .

Special hamburger and a Cheerwine?

Alexia M. Kartis

8:23 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Not in favor of a new city; rather, more interested in reforming the type of government used by the county.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brookhaven

2:52 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Delete
Brookhaven
2:01 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013
Same silly argument we heard in Brookhaven and the Dunwoody folks before us. Since 2008 when Dunwoody formed there have been 2 county elections and here we still are. Changing DeKalb from within is not possible as the electorate here will continue to protect the county as a jobs program . It is just a fact and there is nothing anyone in north or central Dekalb can do about it. For every one "work to change the county" voter there are 10 who will vote to keep the status quo. Municipalization is the only way at present to keep some of your tax dollars locally while transferring the power to utilize those dollars away from the corrupt and incompetent County power structure. Why do you think they don't want any more cities? By incorporating you are simply taking power away from our CEO and bureaucrats and giving it to yourselves.
Advice: clean up your map so that it doesn't cross 1-85 as DECA is a den of mostly radical vipers who will only sap energy and momentum from you.
Get the Tucker and Druid Hills corridor people together to strategize to see if 1 city or 2 cities should be formed. Boundaries are very important to your strategy and one shouldn't just half- ass the proposed map before all issues are worked out.
Prepare for a political campaign by hiring a consultant.
Ask for advice from those who have just completed this process- it can give you a huge leg up.

Crash

8:24 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Would Lorenzville work better?

Reply

Tom Doolittle

9:38 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Like most polls, this one is a false choice between "city or no-city", so I'm glad we have an opportunity to explain in the comments--

There are more fundamental questions:

(1)After one, two, three....(?) forums...questionaires...well thought out polls...What legitimate assumptions can an organizing Alliance make (or not make) about representing the public? Is a "next step" representative committee formed--are carry-over members allowed from the organizing committee?

(2) What would a POPULAR mandate (as in lots of regular citizens) to PROPOSE (not pass) legislation to study a possible city look like? Is that the same as showing a legislator that an Alliance, Inc. has $30,000 to pay for the required economic feasibility study?

(3)At what point does a decision-maker (legislator) accept an equally persuasive counter-valing opinion (a different map?) from another Alliance?

(4) Will a spokes-group welcome a procedural review committee to help it with with public credibility? Examples--committee would:

--Require a list of donors for any money that is used to presumably speak for the community
--Require a "second opinion" study from an out-of-state think tank similar to UGA's Vinson Inst

This may appear to be parsing, but the legitimacy of the process will be just as important or more than how a city might be run in the future. Its the basis of a constitutional charter! The legislature has been irresponsible to date in not mapping this stuff out.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Jonathan Cribbs

9:44 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

It's a very simplistic poll. I'm not sure I'd say it's a false choice though.

Tom Doolittle

10:41 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

"Simplistic" is fine and I suppose you have to do it.
Polls are unfortunately relied upon to define the terms of debate.

Why can't the debate be "how many meetings", "what is neighborhood representation", "what do we do with business partner opinions", "can we change the state law to include other organizing options, like towns", "how much time should we take before offering legislation"...?

City or no city--the poll would suggest there are no other options (and perhaps questions that should be answered before you ask).

Some have called the false choice the beginning of "conventional wisdom"--the toothpaste that once out of the tube, you'll never get back in.

Reply

Tom Doolittle

11:24 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

full1726:
I DO like "Northlake", but as one of the founders of Northlake Alliance, Inc., the writer of "Northlake Romance" (2001 to 2004) and the facilitator of "Northlake Business Forum" (2001-2003), the interrupted blog "Northlake Station" http://northlakestation.blogspot.com/
and countless articles from 2004 to present I'm definitely prejudiced.

I've always thought Northlake deserved its own zip code and would indeed be a town with its own train station one day--then PERHAPS, maybe, would be designated by the state through rigorous judicial and constitutional rules--be designated a CITY based mainly on commerce, not solely a residential criteria.

I'm sure the the name was given full consideration (without discussing with MK's group)--but as I mentioned in my blog piece, my guess is the Grovians would never accept it.

Note: the name Northlake is formed from a lake that had no name before a developer named the business area between 1968 and 1971. Essentially, a big "pond":)

man this fun--thanks for bringing this subject back MK

Reply
Comment_arrow

HamBurger

1:10 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Mr. Tom, prior to its rechristening to North Lake, this lake in the Northlake area was known as Lodge Lake. The old home site sat at overlooking the lake approximately where the Dynasty Garden restaurant is located. By the way, the bull frogs in Simmons Lake are much tastier.

Please pass the yellow mustard!

Cheryl Huvard

1:25 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

I'll leave it to the folks who live in the Lakeside area to decide whether they want to be in a city, but to attempt to incorporate Century Center and the other commercial areas along I85 in order to increase the commercial base is selfish, self-serving, destructive, and non-sensical. I thought we went through all this when Brookhaven tried to do the same thing with its boundaries.

Reply

Tom Doolittle

1:28 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Burgee' you magnificent bastard (para from George Patton)!

"Lodge lake" was either just an affectionate name from the fraternity that built the dam or it was colloquial. Never been on a map. I spoke to a guy's wife who said the "boys" used to haul their dates out to the lodge for dances and hunch punch in the 1930's.

How'd you know all of that stuff? I got the poop from one of the fraternity members from "Georgia Evening College" (you of course know what its name is now)--he is now nearly 90 years old in a home on Clairmont (where else).

I also have the land records where the propoerty was assebled from Depression auctions in 1936.

Did you know the damn has been rebuilt twice and is now about five feet higher than originallly built?

Dynasty Garden is an insult to local history--used to be a theme restaurant there with a mill theme, When I moved here it was Bennigans--then it became part of Northlake Pkwys "fern bar flight".

I have the name of the frat somewhere.

I love this freickin' place.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sparrow

2:43 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

He knows cause there aren't many 90 year olds left in the hood so they all talk.

Agree on taking Century Center being odd. If the DECA people can't get their act together and get in Chamblee then Century Center should go to Brookhaven.

Comment_arrow

Sparrow

2:45 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

And by the way, doesn't the Lakeside map leave isolated islands (not peninsulas, fingers or slivers) of unincorporated areas? I thought that wasn't allowed.

Comment_arrow

HamBurger

4:50 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Ms. Sparrow, LOL, would you autograph my walker?

Mr. Tom, I knew of one dam rebuild, and I think it was the last. The tip-off was the drained lake. There was a lot of education and learning around that lake in later years as well. I hear the hot spot of learning was near the rope swing. For a lake that age it is in remarkable condition; there is very little sediment intrusion.

Please pass the yellow mustard!

Melvin Dunsmoore

3:08 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

I vote "YES". My only objection is that I'm not in the proposed city. Let me in. I'm not sure I would eat any of hambuger's frogs. "Simmons Lake" probably includes run off from the Lakeside HS parking lot, or lawn chemicals from nearby homes.

Reply

Lou

3:10 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

First, I'm 100% for keeping my "Atlanta" address. However, a city of "Northlake"??? You are not really serious. I'm thinking of the numerous posts to the "Patch" about Northlake Mall being an eysore and shoppers from this area bypassing it for Perimeter Mall and Lenox. Why on earth would our lovely area be named for what has become an scab on this community. (AND, yes, I lived here when it was a lovely mall with an upscale Macy's, a Magic Pan restaurant, and many other fine businesses.) Today it has only a negative connotation to most residents in this community--at least those of us who live in zip 30345 .

Reply

Tom Doolittle

3:15 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Burgee' gets a lot more friendly treatment here than on Jacobshaven Patch.

Maybe that's because he gives us history here--everybody likes the history of their neighborhoods. Then again, everybody;s in a good mood on Fridays.

This is the kind of thing I mean about this place--unique. A very productive blog in the BriarPatch (btw--that's my vote for the city name). The name will be impossible.

Hey Burgee': bet you didn't know the original nickname for the Northlake peak (Midway Baptist) was ...hang on..."Lizard's Lope". Find someone who can explain that one!

Reply
Comment_arrow

HamBurger

5:33 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Mr. Tom, I am going to have to pass on your Midway Baptist question. Does that church still have an active congregation?

My Daddy is buried in the Pea Ridge community. Know where that is? Careful now, Ms. Sparrow says I am 90 so it could be a little plot up in the woods somewhere.

By the way, I want to say I saw an old map that did list North Lake listed as Lodge Lake prior to its rechristening.

Please pass the yellow mustard!

Comment_arrow

Tom Doolittle

10:08 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Burget:
I was told about Pea Ridge by one of the Hendersons--passed away at 75 in about 2000. Even his memory failed him (pretty sure he had drunk too much shine). Then I saw something from the Peavine Creek Watershed Alliance (yes there is one) and I'm sure the Pea in Pea Ridge and Pea in Peavine are one and the same--because the Peavine Creek starts at a spring that was very nastily paved over at Crescent Center and then flows along the railroad tracks past Pea Ridge community into Emory U and merges with South Fork P'tree.

Pea Ridge is essentially US 29 near I-285. That would be the ridge. The Pea Ridge community is on the Northlake side of US 29 between Montreal Rd and Frazier. Then again, I could be confusing this with Rehobeth, which was also a community up there.

The reason Midway Baptist is called that is that it is mid-way between Rehobeth Baptist and the baptists on Cham-Tucker and was founded by the folks at Rehobeth Baptist (they named "Lizards Lope").

I have an amazing areal map (4 quads matched up) from 1955 that is quite telling, because that's right before all hell broke loose along the Briarcliff/Lavista Corridor and never looked back.

All these folks used to use a train to get downtown. There was a rail station on Montreal....and one day there will be another. Have a city if you will. I'll take a train.

Comment_arrow

Tom Doolittle

10:59 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Messed that one up--it's the Burnt Fork Creek Alliance and Burnt Fort Creek that runs below Pea Ridge. I have no idea where Peavine came from. Too much 'shine.

Crash

4:23 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Lou, I'm taking the long view, I remember when NorthLake Mall was built and as I look into the future I see where it used to stand.
Cheers

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Doolittle

10:17 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

lets start a movement--i love starting movements--two people make a movement

HamBurger

6:16 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

“Burgee' gets a lot more friendly treatment here than on Jacobshaven Patch.” - Mr. Tom

To be expected for anyone that is not interested in fragmenting of the region and an additional layer of government and you live in Jacobsville.

Folks in Jacobsville claimed they had tried to make changes in county government, but I never saw much of their participation in their government. They don’t participate in their new city government much less participate and demand responsible management of their school system. So, collectively, we get what we deserve. I am not happy with DC and DCSS, but I am amazed that my fellow republicans would vote for more government instead of enlisting their state elected officials to assist them in changing DeKalb. Too bad you guys are not represented by Rep. Mike Jacobs, Rep. Tom Taylor, and Sen. Fran Millar. They consistently ignore county government and school problems yet are so quick to use their influence to create a new city. What is up with that?

You folks want to create a new city down your way? OK, just more property I will end up renting as Section Eight. And, I despise Section Eight.

Please pass the yellow mustard!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brookhaven

3:00 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

A few more tidbits- Hamburger is not a Republican- Patch comment string posters commenting about cityhood are in no way a reliable gauge for true sentiment in your community- Nobody but Hamburger and 3 other people in Brookhaven refer to our city as Jacobshaven or 'ville- raise money now- charter school clusters are an option for cities-hold lots of public meetings-

Tom Doolittle

10:22 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Burget:
You piqued my interest.

Anybody who is honest about it will tell you the reason the elite want new cities is to fortify them away from the poor (and people who don't look like them). Of course, the elite bring us regular folk with them by promising us goodies and if that doesn't work scaring us with the twin tragedies of Burrel and the School Gang--they even conflate the two unrelated themes for synergy.

So--how the heck do you go from forming Ft. Apache against the Bronx to having your property downgraded to low income rentals? Seems contradictory, unless you're talking about a 30-year cycle.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HamBurger

10:01 am on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Mr. Tom, the way I see it folks apparently insist on continuing to ignore the flawed DeKalb government and the catastrophe called DCSS and instead devote their time to creation of new cities. This will make DeKalb County less attractive and in certain situations may impact real estate prices and rentals. However, Section Eight rentals see no barriers and the rent is regular. With values down it is too early to cash out so this is a possible alternative for now.

Do you know there are some neighborhoods in Brookhaven where there are children and you never see a yellow school bus? Private schools have become the choice. Do you know there are some neighborhoods in Brookhaven when children become school age and private school is not an option family’s move from DeKalb County?

Of all of these concerned citizens that have complained about DeKalb government and DCSS and created organizations like C$ND (funded Brookhaven CVI study) and Brookhaven Yes, (yes, all of their creators and board members) I wonder if they ever participated in Leadership DeKalb? Or, is the easy way out for change to further fragment our community by creating new cities?

http://tinyurl.com/auqvo4e

Please pass the yellow mustard!

Comment_arrow

Tom Doolittle

1:35 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Ham:
What you're saying is affluent communities will have low income in the future whether forming cities or not--nothing they can do about it except via a real estate mafia, essentially finding legal ways to redline.

'Cause thats the way it has worked here up until now--we essentially have no Section 8 in many of our neighborhoods--it just happens by "magic". We also weren't hit by the property fraud wave in the early 2000's.

Tucker? Another story everywhere but the Henderson/Midvale corridor and SmokeTail (I include Winding Woods as part of the Midvale area). I suppose there may be Section 8 on the other side of US 29 inside I-285 and Shamrock area. No organized realtor mafia there.

My biggest problem isn't with forming new cities--it is the "Must have cities immdiately" movement. New city movement is happening all over the nation--in fact Florida is wayy ahead of this. The common denominator is race and class in every instance where the state legislature didn't take the lead on dividing city vs county responsibilities and do the entire counties at the same time.

Comment_arrow

Enuff Govt Already

5:51 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

"Municipalization is the only way at present to keep some of your tax dollars locally while transferring the power to utilize those dollars away from the corrupt and incompetent County power structure" from the post by Brookhaven. I have a different take. My perspective from the city of B'haven arguement. More govt is not the answer. Apartheid by municipalization is not the answer. The system of govt is not the problem. It's the quality of the candidates. And another observation; the enormous attention focusing on the BOE is refreshing as I have not seen this much in my lifetime. We should also reasses our perception of the investigation into the CEO as its origins were with an internal county investigation into watershed and it is currently being pursued by an elected official in the same political party as the CEO. And I'll just bet the grand jury has a remarkably similar makeup to the county as a whole. The sky ain't falling.

Comment_arrow

Brookhaven

10:49 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Enuff,
25% of the Dekalb electorate getting up in arms and excited about changing the county means nothing when 75% of the electorate will put the same rascals and policies back in place come election time. Sure a lot of people are talking about trying to change Dekalb but simple numbers are the cold reality -it has been for the last 15 years. Washington D.C. Elected a Mayor who surprised the electorate and made a bold move to change the school system by hiring and then standing by Michele Rhee. Everything is back to normal now. The Mayor was turned out after the first term and Rhee was fired. In Dekalb it all comes down to R's and D's . Your D's are never going to change course and I guess subliminally you like it that way .

Comment_arrow

Enuff Govt Already

12:19 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Mr. Brookhaven, my belief is that govt, especially more govt, is NOT the answer. I'm curious how you pigeon hole that into a particular political affiliation? The foundation that these cities sit upon is not secure thus the cities are not secure. Fix the foundation then decide whether additional govt is needed. Right now all I see is an arguement for more govt because of the demographics. People claim the county is corrupt but fail to note the county is also who discovered it, ivestigated it and started prosecuting those responsible. The BOE/DCSS has never in my memory seen this much attention and I sincerely hope the glare intensifies. Cutting and running is not the answer.

Big Time

10:50 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

This love fest is getting in the way of the real issues. Why don't we get back to discussing the entirely corrupt county government and what we can all do to get away from it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Doolittle

10:57 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Aww Biggie--didn't you want to put a ";)" behind that one? But I get it. Back to reality.

Crash

4:50 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

I don't think that anyone of us really cares what color your skin is. We care about what your values are. My street need re-paving. The public school system is horrible and the quality of the schools is preventing us from selling our homes at a better price. What all of this goes back to is Federal Intervention in Public School. In the 60's DeKalb was one of the top five school systems in the nation. Then the county schools started accepting Federal money which had strings attached. People in Washington don't know how to educate us. We were doing fine. Now that we accept Federal money the school system endorses all the cockamamie B.S. that comes from Washington, and guess what? It doesn't work. If we refuse Federal money and go back to State and County money, can't we have it our way??

Reply

Tom Doolittle

5:21 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Show me data to support our home sales being affected by government problems. The homes on the east side of I-85 sell for a number of reasons. Proximity to specific employment centers and downtown being huge.

In terms of schools, much of the Tucker zone does independent schools and home schooling, altho the school-within-the-school is working well with Intl Bac (as is Druid Hills). Lakeside has been a school-within-a-school for a while at a much higher level--and still enjoys the support and affiliation with the community. In the elementary schools, the parents make the school.

What very few people understand is that when we say this area sells homes with proximity and schools, it includes the plethora of choices with indpendents and specialized programs within the public system like Henderson Mill's STEM. IHM, In-town and St. Pius are basically "neighborhood" schools. We are also going to slammed with new charter schools unlike any area in Atlanta--they want a piece of our highly educated and committed parentry.

Even if an ultimate decision to put cityhood to a vote is "yes", that shoudln't keep us from taking a hard look at our basic assumptions and go in with open eyes.This should form a line of questioning at our upcoming meetings. hysterics and manipulation of public opinion should be a huge issue in our upcoming meetings.

Many should say: show me the data on several claims being made.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HamBurger

7:02 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Mr. Tom, for the economic slowdown just research the S&P Case-Shiller Index for the past three years or so. In Atlanta real estate prices took a hit but location made a really big difference in just how much. Plus, folks taking advantage of the down market by protesting their property taxes reaped a windfall as opposed to those citizen that sit on their arses and just complain about property taxes. Additionally, look at Clayton County and how real estate took a substantial hit during good times because of the school problems there.

When Atlanta eliminated Section Eight housing projects like Perry Homes, Techwood Homes, etc. back in the 90’s a large majority of these folks moved to Section Eight single family rentals in Clayton. When Clayton’s school problems started, concerned Section Eight parents fled creating problems for landlords. Those landlords not strong enough to weather the value reduction gave way to deep pocket landlords that stand to make handsome profits.

Demanding a responsible county government and school system that is known for producing talented and high achieving students should be the main concern of every citizen in DeKalb. Creating another city? You are running away from the problem and you will eventually get what you deserve.

Yes ma’am, extra thin sliced onions and pickles coming right up!

Comment_arrow

Tom Doolittle

11:05 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

Woops--Ham--I see where I wasn't specific enough. When I said to Crash to show me where the data supports home sales being affected, i wasn't talking about the general case--OF COURSE they can be affected by schools. What I was saying is that there isn't any data to support the troubles in DCSS has affected us in THIS area--because of the littany I provided. Will they be affected over the long term if DCSS isn't improved? Not in my estimation because this is the #1 target area for opening new "choice" alternatives. I blogged on that incessantly about CharterGeddon and have an article coming out about two schools that have been announced just this year.

In my estimation, we are in the throws of media induced paranoia, served up by a confluence of orchestrated power structure coups. A switch has been flipped--an old government trick to allow a problem to fester to "emergency" levels and then ride in as a white knight and bring down the bad guys (and cost you money and your freedom). The manufactured white knight is state takeover of the schools and irresponsible legislation that enables "quick draw" new cities.

Comment_arrow

HamBurger

10:23 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Mr. Tom, recently there was an AJC article about folks considering moving to Dunwoody from another state. After a review of the school system they elected to move to Alpharetta. Clearly, there is not a strong movement to avoid more attractive areas of DeKalb, but as time passes and DCSS remains dysfunctional, it will take its toll. That is why it is imperative that citizens focus and become vocal about their expectations regarding DCSS.

Please pass the yellow mustard!

West Hutchison

5:21 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013

I think grabbing Century Center makes perfect sense since the old Fisher family farm that created the trust it is still in used to stretch south of 85 to Fisher Trail near Briarcliff. I definitely would like to see the Oak Grove area incorporated, but not sold on the proposed "Lakeside" boundaries...wondering if we would be better off petitioning to be annexed into Brookhaven or a new city centered more towards Toco Hills/Druid Hills.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Crash

7:31 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Thank you Tom for this enlightening information particularly,
'Can Tucker operate its own separate school district?
Currently, the state constitution forbids the creation of any school districts separate from those that currently operate. City school systems such as Buford and Decatur existed before the moratorium and received a grand fathering by the legislature. The creation of a new school district in Georgia would require the amending the state constitution, which requires. Children living in the city of Tucker would continue to attend DeKalb County public schools."

I had hoped that incorporating would allow direct control over public schools. ;-(

Comment_arrow

Tom Doolittle

7:46 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

On Tucker info--its good to keep in contact with those very comfortable folks. Maybe getting restless behind the closed doors of power. The switch may get flipped.

It'd be good to have Tucker foks at the "Lakeside"/ BriarPatch/ Atlanta Northeast/Northlake/ Hendersonville meeting. Particularly given we share some territory (apparently).

HamBurger

11:46 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

I want to address a couple of Brookhaven’s comments above. Brookhaven (in various Patch incarnations) and I have communicated several times regarding the positives and negatives of the formation of Brookhaven.

First, although I am a conservative, cityhood does not follow party lines. In Brookhaven 23% of the registered voters during primary elections as opposed to general elections (thank you Rep. Mike Jacobs) voted in the referendum for Brookhaven cityhood. Of these 23%, 45% voted no for cityhood. Along party lines the vote was basically slightly more Democrats than Republicans against cityhood. Republicans voting for more government? How odd. The cityhood issue in Brookhaven was NOT along party lines.

Secondly, Rep. Mike Jacobs, who first entered office as a Democrat, then switched parties, and gerrymandered his district to eliminate opposition from the constituents he alienated in the Toco Hills area, has been working on some kind of cityhood action for the past four or five years. You can check his online news letters to his constituents and verify this. The question is, is Rep. Mike Jacobs really a Republican? What kind of Republican would strive for more government for his constituents?

Reply
Comment_arrow

HamBurger

11:46 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

The cityhood issue in Brookhaven has been very divisive in certain neighborhoods. Literally, neighboring folks that once got along very well, and had differing opinions on cityhood, now have strained social relationships or just do not interact at all. Jacobsville is not the happy little burg that some folks would have you think.

The proponents of Brookhaven cityhood that were the founding members/board members of C$ND and Brookhaven Yes claim that they were involved in DeKalb County government and the school system. However, there are many folks that will tell you that they never saw them at any of the county government or school board meetings. I don’t think any of them were graduates of Leadership Dekalb. And, if you are a graduate of Leadership DeKalb, does that not put you in a better position to form alliances and create a better governmental environment in DeKalb County?

Comment_arrow

HamBurger

11:47 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Many have speculated that the Vinson study, the tool utilized to sell the city of Brookhaven to area residents, was flawed. It took some time to release the city budget due to fine tuning of vendor contracts, etc. as expected for a city being slowly rolled out. Chris Pike from city of Dunwoody was enlisted to guide budget development. However, once the budget was released, there was no release of budget details and no where does the budget show payback of the monies borrowed to date. Clearly, not all of the promises made by Brookhaven Yes and J. Max Davis can possibly be kept such as park improvements. And, some services, like police for example, may be less than what the area had with DeKalb once it is rolled out later this year.

It is interesting to note that the footprint of the city of North Atlanta, created in 1924 and dissolved in 1963 (due to abuse of the reasons it was initially formed), located for the most part north of Peachtree Road is comprised mostly of Brookhaven district #1, the folks that were rejected from Dunwoody and did not want to sully themselves and be annexed into Chamblee. The four city districts are equal in population; however, district #1 contains the most voters. They are the elite overlords of Brookhaven. Districts #2, #3 and #4 are clearly drawn to divide and prevent a power base being developed other than district #1.

Comment_arrow

HamBurger

11:47 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

So, we are a city now. We still live in DeKalb County, a county that needs severe government reform. And, DCSS is extremely dysfunctional and from what we see in the last week may remain so for some time to come. But, that is OK, we citizens have put our blinders on and our little burg has “escaped” from DeKalb. Our city leaders will scramble to hold our tax cap while trying to figure out how to live up to the promises made for cityhood creation. Meanwhile, the regional fragmentation has the potential to result in increased taxes on the city portion and county portion of our tax bills in coming years.

But, don’t fear, the plan is to resurrect Milton County and expand it with Sandy Springs, Dunwoody, and Brookhaven. Then we can have our own school system. Just watch for the political shenanigans in future legislative meetings under the capitol dome. Thank you DeKalb for building our infrastructure!

Special hamburger and a Cheerwine anyone?

Comment_arrow

West Hutchison

12:16 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Hamburger: "Republicans voting for more government? How odd." Not odd at all; in complete alignment with the conservative organizing principle of subsidiarity - a matter ought to be handled by the smallest, lowest, or least centralized authority capable of addressing that matter effectively.

Comment_arrow

HamBurger

6:09 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Mr. West, I wonder if you will say that when you have a fourth layer of government (your new city), still have a third layer of government (your county) that needs to be reformed and a dysfunctional school system with no signs of improvement. Just what have you escaped from for the sake of another layer of government?

That is like having a house that becomes so cluttered and instead of cleaning it up you add a couple of rooms to live in. As a conservative, your thoughts along these lines are clearly different from mine.

Please pass the yellow mustard!

Comment_arrow

West Hutchison

6:39 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Hamburger I would say that rather than "adding on a couple of rooms to live in," it is more like being responsible for your own bedroom and collectively keeping the common rooms clean.

Comment_arrow

HamBurger

7:36 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Mr. West, respectfully, and DeKalb is still a mess, your school system is still dysfunctional, but, you will have your new city, still in DeKalb. I wonder if Foursquare gives a special acknowledgement for that.

Please do yourself a favor. Don’t ask your Dunwoody and Brookhaven friends how they like their cities, monitor their city council meetings and research their cities well. You just may learn something!

Please pass the yellow mustard!

Comment_arrow

West Hutchison

8:14 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Hamburger, I have worked in Sandy Springs for 16 years and the before and after incorporation is dramatic. If we get anything close to the improvement in police patrol and common area maintenance I will be thrilled.

Yes, the DCSS is still a mess, but the fact that the DeKalb county electorate elected the BOE is a powerful argument for incorporating into a smaller city. Regardless, the DCSS is a separate entity and their influence will be neutralized by the new charter school amendment and increased scrutiny by a more active & capable state BOE.

Comment_arrow

HamBurger

8:46 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Mr. West, attend Sandy Springs city council meetings regularly and maybe you will learn a few things. Working there is not the same as being a resident, property owner, or business owner.

Best of luck with your new city and your new layer of government, hopefully, you will become involved more than the citizens of Brookhaven have with their new government.

Please pass the yellow mustard!

Kay Clark

4:33 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Everytime a version of this of this vote comes up, it never gets anything close to overwhelming support.

How about accepting that a large percentage of us don't want to split off and quit stirring the pot of dissention and division?

Reply

Tom Doolittle

5:11 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Its hard to accept that 50.0001 % of 15,000 (7,500) voters should decide whether a jurisdiction of 50,000 people should change hands to a group of people that people know as friends, but could possibly have no experience in governance--overnight. Something should be said for the decision most made consciously to live in an unincorporated area with centuries of building a county government. Perhaps there should be a higher threshhold that has nothing to do with a local vote for a state constitutional amendment.
The way the issue has been presented is one of too many people being represented in government by too few people--and other aspects of government "closer to the people". Seems like "closer to the people" should be defined much more clearly by the legislature. Seems like the doctrine of local control should get a re-look and parts of it such as the comprehensive planning law should be revised. Those would be a more appropriate for state constitutional changes because they affect the whole state--not just tinker with a piece of one county.

Then again, it might also be a reasonable local process to ask those that don't want ANY changes to say specifically what they like about an urban jurisdiction that is larger and more populated, yet delivers less benefits than the largest city in the state.

That would be pretty informative conversation in a local convention-type gathering. That's it! Have a political convention to form a local set of rules--new city or not.

Reply
Comment_arrow

West Hutchison

6:23 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Not quite centuries yet Tom, as DeKalb was founded in 1822, and there wasn't much to govern in this area until the 1950's when the county was under the extremely capable leadership of "Mr. DeKalb," Scott Candler, Sr. Leadership is what this is all about for me and I have zero confidence that an electorate that overwhelmingly elects candidates of the caliber of Hank Johnson, Cynthia McKinney, Vernon Jones, and the DCSS BOE will ever have the wisdom to elect candidates capable of governing efficiently.

Tom Doolittle

7:46 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Some wise people said you're better off with a known quantity, no matter how bad it is. I wouldn't go that far, but given the economic risks and propensity for govt (any govt) to grow, I would defer to what we know (and use what I see now as a huge bargaining position both with the legislature and county govt)--for the time being.

Reply

Leave a comment